Sermon for July 11, 2021
Mark 6:14-29
Today’s Gospel reading is one of the
strangest of them all. First, it’s a
flashback, and we don’t come across those very often in Scripture. Second, it’s the only reading in the Gospel of
Mark in which Jesus is not the main actor or subject.1 Third, its placement is just weird. It’s sandwiched between two stories about
Jesus and his disciples doing amazing, marvelous work for God’s kingdom – miraculous
work, even. Just before today’s reading,
Jesus gives his disciples “authority over the unclean spirits” (6:7) and sends
them to cast out demons and heal the sick.
Then comes this flashback about the death of John the Baptist. And just after that, the disciples return to report
the amazing things they’ve done, and Jesus feeds thousands of people from five
loaves and two fish.
So, what’s going on here? Why do we get this bloody flashback in the midst
of miracles?
Let’s look at today’s story. Herod hears about the disciples healing
people with the same holy power that Jesus wields, and Herod’s afraid. First, he’s afraid because someone else is exercising
more power than he has. Herod’s called a
“king,” but he was actually the Romans’ puppet governor of Galilee and Perea …
which, together, were about 15 percent of the size of the Kansas City metro
area.2 So, Herod isn’t nearly
as powerful as he pretends to be. Second,
he’s afraid because he killed John the Baptist, and he fears that this
even-more-powerful Jesus is John the Baptist risen from the dead. Herod is a Jew, after all, and he’s aware of
God’s sovereignty at least on some level.
So, he’s afraid that God, through Jesus, is going to take him down.
Then Mark’s Gospel spends 12 verses on
this flashback that shows us what a tragically broken character Herod really is. He puts John the Baptist in prison because of
his wife, Herodias, who wants John dead.
Herod and Herodias are married contrary to Jewish law, and John the Baptist
has been making a public stink about it. But despite John’s inconvenient truth-telling,
Herod finds John oddly compelling. In fact,
the story says, “Herod feared John, knowing he was a righteous and holy man,
and he protected him” (6:20). Herod “liked
to listen to him,” the story says (6:20), probably first out on the streets, later
in the protective custody of Herod’s prison.
There was something in John’s preaching that captured Herod’s heart and
mind, like a story that makes you uncomfortable but draws you in anyway.
Finally, Herod’s wife, Herodias, has had
enough, and she finds a way to get rid of John by playing on Herod’s greatest
weakness. More than anything else, Herod
worships his own status. So, he throws a
banquet to impress his courtiers and the local leaders, and he makes a stupid,
drunken promise to his wife’s dancing daughter to give her anything she asks. The young dancer goes to her mother, and the
two of them cash in on Herod’s mistake, demanding that he bring in the head of John
the Baptist as the banquet’s last dish.3 Herod has come to his moment of truth, and he
fails, choosing to honor his own status over the kingdom of God. In case you’re keeping score, that’s called
idolatry. And God’s not a fan.
So, there’s our Gospel story, the good
news starring Herod. What a poor excuse
for a main character. Well, maybe that’s
why this flashback is here, sandwiched between stories of Jesus and the disciples
bringing miracles to life: Herod is the anti-disciple, choosing idolatry over God’s
kingdom. And the moral is: Go, and don’t do likewise. End of sermon.
Or, maybe not. Let’s do a little thought experiment. What if Herod had made a different choice? What if he had stood up to Herodias? What if his dancing stepdaughter had asked
for the head of John the Baptist and Herod had said, “No”? He’d come to his fork in the road, and he
could have taken a kingdom turn. He
could have stood before his courtiers and the local leaders and said, “No, that
would be wrong. It’s not worth killing
someone because I made a dumb promise.” And then, what if Herod had kept going in that
kingdom direction, telling his guests that he actually found John the Baptist’s
call compelling – that, as a Jew, he was interested to see how this messiah
thing was going to play out. “After all,”
Herod could have said, “John the Baptist is right that the people out there need
a lot more love than they’re getting now.”
That definitely would have stopped the party. It also would have cost Herod his wife. It probably would have cost him his position
as Rome’s puppet ruler. But I’ll bet Herod
would have slept a lot better at night.
So, why does Harold choose the path he
does? What makes idolatry a good option
in his eyes? Maybe it’s just inertia; it’s
always easier not to change. But maybe
there’s more to it than that. I think Herod
is hopeless, and I think he’s afraid – afraid of where the road less traveled will
take him.
We’re all tempted toward idolatry one way
or another, tempted to honor something that isn’t God rather than honoring God’s
claim on us. That’s true for us as
individuals; it’s true for us as a church; it’s true for us as a society. We can always choose to play it safe and rest
on how far we’ve come. Or we can listen
to the voices of prophets – people like John the Baptist – people whose truth
rubs us the wrong way.
We probably all have those people, or
those points of view, that challenge us – challenge our priorities, or our place
in society, or our worldview. But even
if their message is challenging, we find ourselves listening anyway because we
know there’s something in there we need to hear. Prophets don’t have to be 100 percent right
about everything. Although John the
Baptist certainly gave good advice about repentance, I’m not sure I’d follow
his lead in terms of wardrobe or diet, wearing animal skins and eating
locusts. But when prophets call us to
turn our hearts toward God’s ways rather than following our own temptations to
stay put, we can figure that’s a message we’re supposed to hear.
This isn’t just about choosing to turn
from evil toward good. It’s also about
choosing to go farther instead of being satisfied with how far we’ve come. That applies both to our own practices of following
Jesus and to our journey together as a church.
Here’s an example. For many years, St. Andrew’s has seen itself
as a strong Outreach church, meaning we care for “the least” of Jesus’ brothers
and sisters in need (Matthew 25:40). Years
ago, we felt good about a partnership with a school in Haiti where we provided
bare-minimum salaries to pay more-or-less qualified teachers. Years ago, we felt good about filling
backpacks with food for the weekend for kids at Benjamin Banneker Elementary. Years ago, we felt good about donating our
Christmas Eve offering to local efforts to feed hungry people. Those were all good things to do, no question
about it. But we knew we weren’t
supposed to stop there. When we came to
forks in the road, we kept heading in a kingdom direction.
Now, we support living wages for qualified
teachers at the school in Haiti and offer a hot lunch each day. Now, a number
of St. Andrew’s people are putting themselves out there to build relationships with
families at Benjamin Banneker Elementary. Now, we feed and clothe hundreds of
people downtown through the Free Store at Christmas, in addition to giving our
Christmas Eve offering away. In each of these cases, we could have chosen to
rest on success. But in each of these
cases, a prophet or two had a vision of the kingdom of God made manifest among
us. And in each of these cases, we
listened to those persistent voices calling us to be the body of Christ in the
world even more fully than we knew how to be.
So, who is John the Baptist for you – personally
and collectively? What is a message that
challenges you but that you keep coming back to hear? As individuals and as a church, what do we
need to take up, or what do we need to set aside, in order to work miracles we’d
never dreamed we could?
As followers of Jesus, and as his body living and active in the world, we bear the power to heal and cast out demons. We bear the power to serve as Jesus’ hands and feet, passing along the bounty God multiplies from five loaves and two fish. But to do that, we have to flip the script from today’s reading. As Herod chose to be the anti-disciple, we’ve got to choose to be the anti-Herod. We’ve got to choose not to rest on how far we’ve come. We’ve got to take risks that will challenge us and maybe let go of things we’ve always clung to. We’ve got to let the prophet out jail, and bring him to the table, and together take the banquet of the kingdom on the road.
1.
New Interpreters Study Bible, note on verses
6:14-29, p. 1819.
2.
Herod’s
territory of Perea was about 550 square miles, and Galilee was about 720 square
miles. So together, their areas were about
1,270 square miles. The Kansas City metro
area is about 8,500 square miles.
3.
New Interpreter’s Study Bible, note on verses
6:24-25, p. 1819.
No comments:
Post a Comment