Sermon for Epiphany, transferred, Jan. 2, 2022
Matthew
2:1-12
OK, let’s pretend we’re in seventh-grade English
class. Who are the main characters in
today’s Gospel story? Here’s a hint: They’re really tall, and they get impressive
music for their entrance and exit.
OK, who’s another main character in today’s
Gospel story? Here’s a hint: We don’t have a puppet for him because
he’s a scoundrel. Yes, it’s King Herod,
the man we love to hate. When he’s named
in the story, it makes you want to boo and hiss and throw peanuts. Herod is awful – no redeeming social value,
the contrast to everything good and holy.
But interestingly, Herod gets most of the ink in today’s reading. In fact, I think he’s absolutely necessary to
this story. But what luck do you think
we’d have getting somebody to wear the Herod puppet when we celebrate Epiphany? We’re much happier when we get to be one of the
good guys.
And while we’re thinking about who gets
the ink in this story, it’s interesting to think about who is not a main
character. In that category, I’d put Mary,
who has nothing to say. Joseph isn’t
even there, completely absent from the story.
And maybe most surprisingly, the Lord and Savior himself doesn’t do anything
but lie there, with all the action revolving around him.
Well, let’s look at these main characters
and see what they might have to say about us.
First, the magi. They were astrologers and magicians, but not
with the baggage those terms carry for us.
When we hear “astrologer and magician,” that might say to us “entertainer”
or, worse, “con man.” That’s not what it
meant to be an astrologer and magician back in the day. They were seen more the way we might see
scientists, people with specialized knowledge who could carefully observe and
even manipulate the created order to serve human purposes. Magi were respected across Ancient Near East
cultures, even within Judaism. One ancient
historian reports that the curtain in the Temple protecting the holy of holies
was decorated with constellations of stars.1 And there was a prophecy in Hebrew scriptures
about how “a star shall rise out of Jacob” – that the nation of Israel, led by God’s
anointed king, would one day throw off its oppressors and regain a lost empire
of its own.2 So, it wouldn’t
have been all that strange for watchers of the skies from a distant land to
come to investigate the reality on the ground after they’d seen a star that
seemed to indicate this prophecy might be realized.
So, our first main characters are the magi,
however many of them there were. Then we
have the other main character – King Herod. Now, Herod was a “king” in title only; his
Roman overlords allowed him to play that role among his own people as long as he
did what he was told. Herod was Jewish,
and he went by the title “King of the Jews” – so it must have been a surprise,
to say the least, when these respected astrologers came looking for “the child
who has been born king of the Jews” (Matt 2:2). Like a stereotypical gangster, Herod isn’t powerful
enough to allow his rivals to thrive, so he immediately goes into self-preservation
mode. He cozies up to the magi, drawing
them into a plot to kill the baby before anyone has time to follow him as the
true king. A few verses later in Matthew’s
story, we find out just how awful Herod really is – that he’s basically a terrorist
as he kills all the babies of Bethlehem two years old or under (Matt 2:16-18). Herod represents the human heart at its
worst: someone so afraid of losing power and control that he kills the innocent
to protect his own interests.
So, what was Matthew trying to say about Herod,
and the magi, and the baby king? As is
true of the best stories, I think this one can say several things at once.
Is the story about the gifts the magi
bring to Jesus? Sure. For centuries, interpreters have seen
symbolic power in the gold, frankincense, and myrrh; and the famous carol we sang
frames this theological reflection nicely.
Gold would signify kingship, indicating that Jesus is the ultimate ruler. Frankincense, used in Temple worship, would
signify deity, indicating that Jesus is God Most High having come to dwell as God
With Us. And myrrh, used to anoint bodies
for burial, would signify sacrifice, foreshadowing the death by which this king
and God would defeat death itself at Easter.
Did Matthew intend all that symbolism when he named the magi’s three
gifts? I don’t know, but it sure works
nicely with the way Christian theology developed.
So, what else might this story mean? Is it an indictment of the power of Herod,
and the emperor, and every secular government or culture that sees itself as greater
than the reign and rule of God? Sure. Given that the Gospels were compiled soon
after the Roman army destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple, God’s own dwelling
place on earth, the early Christians definitely wanted to stick it to the empire. So, putting Herod in his place in this story
is a great way to show how the power of self-interest, evil, and death embodied
in human institutions does not get the last word. Instead, God intervenes to lead the nations
of the world to come and find Jesus, outsmarting and overturning those who
think they can compete with the Lord.
Now, it might be tempting to stop
there. In fact, it might be in our
self-interest to keep this Epiphany story at arm’s length. If it’s mostly a reflection on the person of
Jesus, that’s safely interesting. If it’s
mostly a reflection on the reign and rule of God, and an indictment of
governments and cultures that stand in God’s way, well, that’s safely
interesting. But I think Jesus would
probably like us to go a little deeper, too, and see what this story has to say
about us.
It's easy to look at King Herod as a stock
character – Snidely Whiplash from the old Rocky & Bullwinkle
cartoons, or Darth Vader from Star Wars.
In good stories, we need to see evil embodied as a contrast to the power
of goodness and light. But in our
personal stories, we don’t need Snidely Whiplash or Darth Vader. We carry them with us every day. As much as I might like to caricature the dark
side of my heart, or ascribe that darkness to whichever political leaders I
might see as the Romans of today, Herod is there to remind me that the urge for
self-preservation, maybe even self-promotion, always lies close at hand. We justify the dubious decisions we make,
saying they were necessary or that the good outweighed the bad. Often, that’s right and true. Life is complicated, and none of us gets to
live in the land of black and white. But
still, it’s good to have Herod there, staring back at us in our own self-reflection,
making us ask the hard questions about our motivations as we navigate our way
through oceans of gray.
You know, maybe we should have a Herod puppet for Epiphany after all. It might be a good way to remember this truth: that God always opens the door so that, like the magi, we, too, can go home by another way. But we have to decide to follow the magi’s lead and choose that path instead.
1.
Albright,
W.F., and C.S. Mann. Matthew. Vol. 26 of The Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday, 1971. 15.
2.
Numbers
24:17. See Hare, Douglas R.A. Matthew. In Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for
Teaching and Preaching. Louisville: John
Knox Press, 1993. 14.
No comments:
Post a Comment